The Mellor Law Firm, APLC

California Real Estate, Construction, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Business Litigation Lawyers

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Call: (951) 221-4744

  • Our Firm
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate Law
    • Construction Law Attorney
    • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
    • Business Law
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Contract Disputes
    • Insurance
    • Loan Modifications
    • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
    • Mechanic’s Lien
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Contact

Summary Of Documents Supported By Declaration Based On Information And Belief Found To Be Enough To Support The Grant Of Summary Judgment.

October 18, 2014 by Leave a Comment

Declaration Based On Information And Belief Evidence in support of a motion for summary judgment included the declaration based on information and belief of a lawyer representing the moving party in which he avers he has “personal knowledge of the foregoing, except as to those matters stated on information and belief.” He indicates in his declaration he reviewed the 80 documents produced by another defendant in discovery and prepared a spreadsheet which tracked the dates of work on the project. The opposing party objected to the lawyer’s declaration on grounds of hearsay, lack of personal knowledge, improper opinion evidence and speculation. The trial court overruled the opposing party’s objections to the moving party’s evidence in its motion for summary judgment, and then granted the motion for summary judgment.

In affirming, the majority of appellate justices stated: “Evidence Code section 1521 expressly permits the admission of secondary evidence to prove the content of a writing except when a ‘genuine dispute exists concerning material terms of the writing.’ Section 1523, subdivision (d), of the Evidence Code expressly permits oral testimony of the content of a writing if ‘the writing consists of numerous accounts for other writings that cannot be examined in court without great loss of time, and the evidence sought from them is only the general result of the whole.’” The majority does state: “Secondary evidence, of course, must comply with the rules governing the admissibility of evidence generally, including relevance [citation] and the hearsay rule.”

The dissenting justice pointed out there was no foundation the underlying documents reviewed were either business records or official records, and that Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (d), requires that supporting and opposing declarations shall be made by any person on personal knowledge, shall set forth admissible evidence and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated in the declarations. The dissent also states: “Evidence Code section 1523 is a best evidence rule allowing secondary evidence to prove the content of a writing. In this case, the dissenting justice continues, the discovery requests were not for business records, but for any and all documents. The requests did not ask that any custodian of records submit a verification coinciding with the foundational requirements of Evidence Code sections 1271 or 1280, but merely a verification under penalty of perjury that the copies provided are adequate and true and complete. Some of the documents produced, 62 pages, were from other companies, not the company responding to the document requests. According to the dissent, the “fact” in dispute was whether or not there was a continuous 30-day cessation of work which would commence the limitations period, so this issue does not appear to be one of form over substance. (Golden State Boring & Pipe Jacking, Inc. v. Eastern Municipal Water District (Safeco Insurance Company) (Cal. App. Fourth Dist., Div. 2; July 23, 2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 273, [175 Cal.Rptr.3d 116].)

Filed Under: Appellate Law News, Attorney-Client / Attorney Work Product Law News, Discovery Law News, Evidentiary Law News, Legal News, Procedural Law News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Call Us: 951-222-2100

Consultations available in-office or over
the phone. Speak to one of our leading attorneys in California today.

Recent News

What Is Commercial Litigation and How Does It Affect Your Business?

May 23, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Every business, regardless of its size or industry, faces unique challenges. Among these, legal disputes can often be the most daunting and disruptive. Commercial litigation, a specialized area of law, serves as a framework for resolving disputes arising from business … Read More...

Common Types of Real Estate Fraud

May 21, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Real estate transactions are some of the most significant financial decisions you’ll make in your lifetime. Unfortunately, the complexity of these deals creates opportunities for fraud. Whether you’re a buyer, seller, or investor, knowing how to protect yourself and recognize … Read More...

Everything You Need to Know About Adverse Possession in California

April 11, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Adverse possession is a legal concept that might sound surprising—it allows someone to claim ownership of property they don’t legally own, as long as specific conditions are met. While this might bring to mind images of opportunists taking over abandoned properties, adverse … Read More...

Follow Mellor Law Firm

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Our Areas of Practice

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Navigate

  • Home
  • Our Firm
  • Mark Mellor
  • Practice Areas
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

Practice Areas

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Recent Posts

  • What Is Commercial Litigation and How Does It Affect Your Business?
  • Common Types of Real Estate Fraud
  • Everything You Need to Know About Adverse Possession in California
  • Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Wrongful Death Claims

Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Contact our offices

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 220
Riverside, CA 92506
Phone: (951) 221-4744
Fax: (951) 222-2122
10.0Mark Albert Mellor

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC © 2025. All Rights Reserved.