The Mellor Law Firm, APLC

California Real Estate, Construction, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Business Litigation Lawyers

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Call: (951) 221-4744

  • Our Firm
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate Law
    • Construction Law Attorney
    • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
    • Business Law
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Contract Disputes
    • Insurance
    • Loan Modifications
    • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
    • Mechanic’s Lien
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Contact

Reasonable Accommodation Does Not Require Elimination Of Essential Job Function.

May 27, 2015 by Leave a Comment

Reasonable Accommodation Plaintiff injured his knee at work in 2003 and thereafter underwent several surgeries and procedures, and was placed on light duty. The employer, a public entity, had an accommodations committee which offered plaintiff either a lateral job move or a demotion to assume a lesser job, neither of which appealed to plaintiff. As negotiations continued, plaintiff performed a job with restrictions, and injured his lower back in 2006, after which he never returned to work. Another knee surgery was performed and accommodation negotiations continued. At some point, plaintiff filed a complaint with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing [DFEH] and obtained a right to sue letter. The instant suit, filed in 2011, alleges the employer refused to reinstate him with or without an accommodation in causes of action for disability discrimination, failure to provide reasonable accommodation, failure to engage in an interactive process and retaliation. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the employer. On appeal, with regard to the statute of limitations, plaintiff argued the “continuing violation doctrine,” but that argument was rejected because plaintiff did not develop it.  In affirming, the appellate court concluded the employer was not required to eliminate essential functions from a job to accommodate the plaintiff, and his inability to perform an essential function was “enough to move on to other alternatives, such as reassignment.” (Nealy v. City of Santa Monica (Cal. App. Second Dist., Div. 8; February 13, 2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 359, [184 Cal.Rptr.3d 9].)

Filed Under: Appellate Law News, Discrimination Law News, Employment Law News, Legal News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Call Us: 951-222-2100

Consultations available in-office or over
the phone. Speak to one of our leading attorneys in California today.

Recent News

How to Prepare Your Business for a Merger or Acquisition

July 16, 2025 By Mark Mellor

With the 50,000 merger and acquisition (M&A) deals that happened globally in 2024, it is evident that businesses are constantly looking for ways to grow and expand. M&A deals can provide a quick and effective way for companies to enter new markets, acquire new … Read More...

What Is Commercial Litigation and How Does It Affect Your Business?

May 23, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Every business, regardless of its size or industry, faces unique challenges. Among these, legal disputes can often be the most daunting and disruptive. Commercial litigation, a specialized area of law, serves as a framework for resolving disputes arising from business … Read More...

Common Types of Real Estate Fraud

May 21, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Real estate transactions are some of the most significant financial decisions you’ll make in your lifetime. Unfortunately, the complexity of these deals creates opportunities for fraud. Whether you’re a buyer, seller, or investor, knowing how to protect yourself and recognize … Read More...

Follow Mellor Law Firm

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Our Areas of Practice

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Navigate

  • Home
  • Our Firm
  • Mark Mellor
  • Practice Areas
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

Practice Areas

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Recent Posts

  • How to Prepare Your Business for a Merger or Acquisition
  • What Is Commercial Litigation and How Does It Affect Your Business?
  • Common Types of Real Estate Fraud
  • Everything You Need to Know About Adverse Possession in California

Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Contact our offices

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 220
Riverside, CA 92506
Phone: (951) 221-4744
Fax: (951) 222-2122
10.0Mark Albert Mellor

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC © 2025. All Rights Reserved.