The Mellor Law Firm, APLC

California Real Estate, Construction, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Business Litigation Lawyers

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Call: (951) 221-4744

  • Our Firm
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate Law
    • Construction Law Attorney
    • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
    • Business Law
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Contract Disputes
    • Insurance
    • Loan Modifications
    • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Contact

Classifications Based On Sexual Orientation Require Heightened Scrutiny.

March 15, 2014 by Leave a Comment

Sexual OrientationThe allegations are that drug company #1 licensed to drug company #2 the authority to market drug company #1’s HIV drug.  After it sold the license to its drug, drug company #1 increased the price fourfold. Meanwhile back at drug company #1, another HIV drug was being marketed at a much lesser cost, thus driving business to the lesser-priced HIV drug that drug company #1 was marketing itself. Drug company #2 brought an action against drug company #1 for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, violation of antitrust laws as well as other causes of action. During jury selection, one of the jurors self-identified as being gay, and drug company #1 exercised its first peremptory challenge against that person. Drug company #2 challenged the peremptory strike, arguing it was impermissible under Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79, [106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69], in that the juror was excused on the basis of sexual orientation. The trial court permitted the strike, but indicated it would reconsider the ruling if drug company #1 struck other gay members of the venire. In the end, the jury returned a mixed verdict, not awarding everything requested by drug company #2, but awarding it $3,486,240 in damages. Drug company #1 appealed, and drug company #2 cross-appealed, agreeing a retrial was needed due to the Batson violation. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the matter, stating: “We hold that heightened scrutiny applies to classifications based on sexual orientation and that Batson applies to strikes on that basis.  Because a Batson violation occurred here, this case must be remanded for a new trial.” (Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Abbott Laboratories (Ninth Cir.; January 21, 2014) 740 F.3d 471.)

Filed Under: Appellate Law News, Discrimination Law News, Legal News, LGBT Law News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Call Us: 951-222-2100

Consultations available in-office or over
the phone. Speak to one of our leading attorneys in California today.

Recent News

Buying Your First House: Here is What You Need to Know About Mortgages

August 15, 2023 By Mark Mellor

Congratulations! You're ready to take the leap into homeownership, an exciting journey that begins with understanding mortgages. A mortgage is a loan provided by a lender that helps you to buy a house. You repay this loan, with interest, over a specified period. Let's dive … Read More...

Involved in a Construction Accident? Know the Types of Compensation Available

August 8, 2023 By Mark Mellor

Construction sites are bustling with activity, but amidst the organized chaos, accidents can occur, leading to severe consequences for those involved. Construction accidents can result in devastating injuries, significant medical bills, lost wages, and emotional trauma. If you … Read More...

Failure to Disclose: What Are Your Rights If a Home Seller Conceals a Defect?

July 5, 2023 By Mark Mellor

When it comes to buying a home, transparency is crucial. In the real estate world, sellers have a legal duty to provide buyers with written disclosures that outline any known defects or material facts about the property. These disclosures are designed to protect buyers and ensure … Read More...

Follow Mellor Law Firm

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Our Areas of Practice

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Navigate

  • Home
  • Our Firm
  • Mark Mellor
  • Practice Areas
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

Practice Areas

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Recent Posts

  • Buying Your First House: Here is What You Need to Know About Mortgages
  • Involved in a Construction Accident? Know the Types of Compensation Available
  • Failure to Disclose: What Are Your Rights If a Home Seller Conceals a Defect?
  • Are Verbal Agreements Legally Binding in the Construction Industry?

Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Contact our offices

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 220
Riverside, CA 92506
Phone: (951) 221-4744
Fax: (951) 222-2122
10.0Mark Albert Mellor

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC © 2023. All Rights Reserved.