The Mellor Law Firm, APLC

California Real Estate, Construction, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Business Litigation Lawyers

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Call: (951) 221-4744

  • Our Firm
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate Law
    • Construction Law Attorney
    • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
    • Business Law
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Contract Disputes
    • Insurance
    • Loan Modifications
    • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
    • Mechanic’s Lien
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Contact

“It’s Simple, If It Jiggles, It’s Fat,” Arnold Schwarzenegger.

July 22, 2015 by

CEQA Apparently in an attempt to make the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA; Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.] less burdensome, the Legislature expressly exempted several categories of projects from CEQA review, projects which did not have a significant effect on the environment. Guidelines were written to implement the statute, and one of those exempted projects is single family homes.  Well, the planned single family home, involved in this case, is a 6,478-square-foot mansion with an attached 3,394-square-foot 10-car garage. Pursuant to the guidelines, a City approved the permit application to build the single-family home. The Court of Appeal invalidated the permit, relying on another guideline which provides: “A categorical exemption shall not be used where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.” The California Supreme Court granted review and in reversing the Court of Appeal stated, “the Court of Appeal erred by holding that a potentially significant environmental effect itself constitutes an unusual circumstance. . .[t]he plain language of [the] Guidelines . . . requires that a potentially significant effect must be ‘due to unusual circumstance’ for the exception to apply. . . [t]his bifurcated approach to the questions of unusual circumstances and potentially significant effects comports with our construction of the unusual circumstances exception to require findings of both unusual circumstances and a potentially significant effect.”  The case was remanded for further proceedings.  In his concurring opinion, Justice Liu remarked: “It is unfortunate that today’s opinion, instead of simplifying the law in accordance with the CEQA statute and guidelines, adds further complexity to an area that many courts, practitioners, and citizens already find difficult to navigate.” (Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley (Cal. Sup. Ct.; March 2, 2015) 60 Cal.4th 1086 [184 Cal.Rptr.3d 643, 343 P.3d 834].)

Filed Under: California Supreme Court Law News, CEQA Law News, Legal News Tagged With: § 21000, 184 Cal.Rptr.3d 643, 343 P.3d 834, 60 Cal.4th 1086, Pub. Resources Code § 21000, Public Resources Code section 21000, section 21000

Call Us: 951-222-2100

Consultations available in-office or over
the phone. Speak to one of our leading attorneys in California today.

Recent News

How to Protect Yourself in a Business Partnership

December 31, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Starting a new venture with a partner is an exciting experience. You have a shared vision, complementary skills, and the drive to build something great together. However, enthusiasm alone isn't enough to sustain a company. A business partnership requires trust, communication, … Read More...

Managing Change Orders Without Derailing Your Construction Project

December 26, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Few construction projects finish exactly as the initial blueprints dictated. Whether it’s a sudden discovery of unstable soil, or a client deciding they want terrazzo floors instead of tile, adjustments are an inevitable part of the building process. These adjustments are handled … Read More...

Top Legal Mistakes to Avoid When Starting an LLC in California

December 2, 2025 By Mark Mellor

Starting an LLC in California is an exciting step for any entrepreneur. You've got your business idea, you're ready to make it official, and you can already picture the success ahead. But here's the reality: many new LLC owners make preventable legal mistakes that can derail … Read More...

Follow Mellor Law Firm

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Our Areas of Practice

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Navigate

  • Home
  • Our Firm
  • Mark Mellor
  • Practice Areas
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

Practice Areas

  • Comprehensive Real Estate Legal Services
  • Construction Law Attorney
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Experienced Foreclosure Attorney Serving Riverside Homeowners
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Recent Posts

  • How to Protect Yourself in a Business Partnership
  • Managing Change Orders Without Derailing Your Construction Project
  • Top Legal Mistakes to Avoid When Starting an LLC in California
  • How Long Do You Have to File a Construction Defect Claim?

Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Contact our offices

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 220
Riverside, CA 92506
Phone: (951) 221-4744
Fax: (951) 222-2122
10.0Mark Albert Mellor

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC © 2026. All Rights Reserved.