The Mellor Law Firm, APLC

California Real Estate, Construction, Bankruptcy, Foreclosure and Business Litigation Lawyers

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Call: (951) 221-4744

  • Our Firm
  • Attorney Profile
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate Law
    • Construction Law
    • Foreclosures
    • Business Law
    • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Contract Disputes
    • Insurance
    • Loan Modifications
    • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Contact

Arbitration Agreement In Employment Case Unconsionable.

November 9, 2015 by

arbitration agreementIn a wrongful termination action, the trial court denied defendant’s  petition to compel arbitration because the agreement is procedurally and substantively unconscionable. On plaintiff’s first day of work, she was provided electronic access to the employer’s “onboarding system,” which included an arbitration agreement. Later the same day, plaintiff attempted to negotiate some of the terms because she said the agreement was too broad and did not include “several important terms.” The next day the general manager arranged a telephone conference call for plaintiff, the general manager and the human resources manager to discuss plaintiff’s concerns. During the call, plaintiff wanted to know who would pay for the arbitration and which firm would conduct it. The arbitration clause states in part: “I agree, as does the Company, to abide by the Company’s Dispute Resolution Policy (‘DRP’) and to arbitrate any dispute, claim, or controversy regarding or arising out of my employment (as defined by the Company’s DRP, a copy of which I may request at any time) that may arise between me and the Company, its parent, subsidiaries, affiliates or any other persons or entities acting as its agent.” In opposing the petition to compel arbitration, plaintiff submitted her own declaration which stated she was not given a copy of or access to the DRP. She further declared that during the conversation with the general manager and the human resources manager on her second day of employment, she requested a copy of the DRP to assist her in trying to negotiate an arbitration agreement to which she could agree, but the two managers told her they did not have a copy of it. Plaintiff also said she was told a copy of the DRP might be available at a later time, but if she did not sign the arbitration agreement as presented to her, it would be viewed as a refusal of the job offer, so she signed it. The Court of Appeal affirmed, stating “a high degree of procedural unconscionability accompanied the signing of the Agreement in this case,” the trial court’s findings that the agreement was one-sided, objectively unreasonable and lacked mutuality were supported by substantial evidence, and that substantive unconsionability permeated the entire agreement. (Carlson v. Home Team Pest Defense, Inc. (Cal. App. First Dist. Div. 4; August 17, 2015) 239 Cal.App.4th 619 [191 Cal.Rptr.3d 29].)

Filed Under: Appellate Law News, Arbitration Law News, Legal News Tagged With: 191 Cal.Rptr.3d 29, 239 Cal.App.4th 619

Call Us: 951-222-2100

Consultations available in-office or over
the phone. Speak to one of our leading attorneys in California today.

Recent News

When and How to Sue After a Car Crash

December 30, 2020 By admin

Getting in a car crash can be detrimental to your physical and mental well-being. To compensate for stress, injuries, and damage to your vehicle, you should ensure that you get the compensation you deserve. An experienced personal injury lawyer can help you with that. Reasons … Read More...

When a Tenant Can Sue a Landlord

December 30, 2020 By admin

Rental agreements must be upheld by both the landlord and the tenant. If the landlord or rental company violates the agreement, it may be grounds for legal action by the tenant. In most cases, a tenant will sue their landlord after moving out, but a tenant can also sue while they … Read More...

Does Foreclosure Affect Your Credit?

December 18, 2020 By Mark Mellor

Even if you have carefully planned your budget, income, and expenses down to the last cent, things don’t always go the way you expect them to. Life might get in the way and ruin your plans—and a bad investment, medical emergency, natural disaster, or other catastrophe can … Read More...

Follow Mellor Law Firm

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Our Areas of Practice

  • Real Estate
  • Construction Law
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Foreclosures
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Navigate

  • Home
  • Our Firm
  • Mark Mellor
  • Practice Areas
  • Case Handling
  • Clients
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy

Practice Areas

  • Real Estate
  • Construction Law
  • Mechanic’s Lien – Stop Notice
  • Foreclosures
  • Business Law
  • Contract Disputes
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Insurance
  • Lien Stripping Bankruptcy
  • Loan Modifications
  • Personal Injury & Wrongful Death
  • Property Ownership

Recent Posts

  • When and How to Sue After a Car Crash
  • When a Tenant Can Sue a Landlord
  • Does Foreclosure Affect Your Credit?
  • Most Common Causes of Construction Accidents

Follow Us

    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

Contact our offices

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC
6800 Indiana Avenue, Suite 220
Riverside, CA 92506
Phone: (951) 221-4744
Fax: (951) 222-2122
10.0Mark Albert Mellor

The Mellor Law Firm, APLC © 2021. All Rights Reserved.